January 2012
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

What Meth Does to a Community

Crystal methamphetamine

Image via Wikipedia

Metham­phet­a­mine is a drug made from “off the shelf items” heated to form an explo­sive com­plex mix­ture that is fur­ther dis­tilled into a “high profit street drug”. It is becom­ing the “hill billy” quick profit moon­shine drug of the coun­try. For ever part of “pro­duced street drug” six equal parts become a toxic sludge that is qui­etly dumped on farm­lands, along urban streets and into our water shed.

Meth Addic­tion; the Sources

From clin­i­cal research, it has been dis­cov­ered that there is direct rela­tion­ship between the “qual­ity of the ephedrine” and the rate of extent of addic­tion. India was the num­ber one pro­ducer ship­ping into Mex­ico for pro­cess­ing and deliv­ery into the USA dur­ing the 90’s. The Indi­ans began to real­ize their “OTC anti­his­t­a­mine” was the pri­mary source so they stopped production.

The Lat­est High qual­ity Ephedrine Manufacturer

The Chi­nese took up pro­duc­ing the high qual­ity “OTC anti­his­t­a­mine” for the same drug mar­ket. The qual­ity increased the addic­tion rate and the Chi­nese use the money to sub­si­dize their metham­phet­a­mine addic­tion recov­ery pro­grams for the Chi­nese people.

Is Metham­phet­a­mine a True “Street Drug”?

The real­ity of metham­phet­a­mine is that is dif­fer­ent than any “street drug” encoun­tered before it. The per­son tak­ing the drug is not the only per­son that is receiv­ing a “dosage”. In fact, when one per­son smokes a “crack pipe with metham­phet­a­mine” the whole city block receives a dosage and the drug shows up in their blood stream. Meth does not dis­crim­i­nate against age, color, or social class; it is a equal oppor­tu­nity destroyer of prop­erty, lives, and the environment.

What Makes Metham­phet­a­mine Stand out from Other “Street Drugs”?

Metham­phet­a­mine is in a small group of drugs some “designer” that does per­ma­nent dam­age to the brain chem­istry. Metham­phet­a­mine and other drugs that inter­fere with the pro­duc­tion of dopamine destroy the individual’s abil­ity to “feel or emote”. Metham­phet­a­mine is the drug of choice for con­trol­ling an individual.

The Side Effects of Methamphetamine

The drug can cause blind rages that have resulted in the deaths of oth­ers. The drug mim­ics schiz­o­phre­nia, delu­sional behav­ior and men­tal ill­ness. The use of Metham­phet­a­mine per­ma­nently destroys parts of the brain the directly affect heal­ing, emo­tion, sta­bil­ity, bal­ance, and cog­ni­tion. The psy­chotic symp­toms of meth use can last for months or years after metham­phet­a­mine use has stopped.

When the euphoric effects of metham­phet­a­mine wear off, addicts enter what is called the “tweak­ing stage”. The addict is capa­ble of vio­lence, delu­sions, para­noia, and feel­ings of empti­ness. Sleep usu­ally is impos­si­ble; addicts in this stage metham­phet­a­mine of abuse can become vio­lent with­out provocation.

The addict craves the drug to the point of doing any­thing to get to the drug. Metham­phet­a­mines pro­voke some of the strongest with­drawal symp­toms which make it so impor­tant to a traf­ficker to get their vic­tims to cooperate.

What Seg­ment of the Under­world is most likely to Use and Pro­mote Methamphetamines?

The sex slave trade uses this drug exten­sively. Metham­phet­a­mines rob vic­tims of the most pre­cious resource; their mind. Metham­phet­a­mines pre­vent vic­tims from escap­ing, cop­ing with the sit­u­a­tion, and the abil­ity to fight the abuse they are forced to with­stand. Texas and Cal­i­for­nia are the two largest enclaves for human traf­fick­ing, http://bit.ly/r8tw4W.

The Rise of Methamphetamine 

Since metham­phet­a­mine has become the “drug of choice for forced slave labor” the amount of child sex slave work­ers in the United States has grown to roughly 100,000 or more. Texas and Cal­i­for­nia are on the front of this ter­ri­ble indus­try. Oddly enough the inci­dence of meth in these two states is high also. The aver­age life of a “slave” is four years.

Texas and Cal­i­for­nia remain on the fore­front of the Meth influx and abuse with Texas hav­ing seized 1727.5 pounds of meth in 2008, lat­est research, 2008 and Cal­i­for­nia hav­ing seized 420.9 pounds of meth, lat­est research 2006.

What Pos­si­ble Kinds of Haz-Mat Mate­ri­als are dumped on our Land and into our Water Systems?

The EPA esti­mates that for each pound of metham­phet­a­mine pro­duced, between five and six pounds of highly toxic waste is gen­er­ated. Many of these sub­stances have long term impact on the envi­ron­ment. Read­ing the list of chem­i­cals is like look­ing at a report on the Love Canal (Super fund Clean Up Waste Site).

What About the Chemicals?

Most of the chem­i­cals and their metabo­lites (oxi­dized and digested com­po­nents) are more toxic than the orig­i­nal chem­i­cals. A large per­cent­age of these chem­i­cals have the capac­ity to be bio­log­i­cally absorbed into liv­ing crea­tures, via water, air or inges­tion. The chem­i­cals found below have the poten­tial to explode dur­ing the process of mak­ing Methamphetamine.

Such chem­i­cals have the poten­tial to be air­borne an inhaled by peo­ple as far as a mile away from the “Lab”. There are no safety pro­to­cols by those that “Cook Meth”. No com­mu­nity can sur­vive (health or envi­ron­men­tally) the onslaught of chem­i­cal pol­lu­tion that Metham­phet­a­mine driz­zles upon the landscape.

Sub­stances found at Metham­phet­a­mine Lab­o­ra­tory Sites by the EPA:

Cyanides– highly toxic

Irri­tants and Cor­ro­sives– highly toxic to mildly toxic

Acetic Acid (liq­uid), Acetic Anhy­dride (liq­uid), Acetyl Chlo­ride (liq­uid), Ammo­nium Hydrox­ide (liq­uid), Ben­zyl Chloride(liquid), Dimethyl­sul­fate (liq­uid), Formalde­hyde (liq­uid), Formic Acid (liq­uid), Hydro­gen chlo­ride or Hydrochlo­ric Acid (gas,liquid), Hydro­bromic Acid (liq­uid), Hydr-Iodic Acid (liq­uid), Hydrox­y­lamine (liq­uid, solid), Methy­lamine (liq­uid, gas, solid), Meth­yl­ene chlo­ride (dichloromethane, meth­yl­ene dichloride)(liquid), Methyl Methacry­late (liq­uid), Nitroethane (liq­uid), Oxa­lyl Chlo­ride (liq­uid), Per­chlo­ric Acid (liq­uid), Phenyl­mag­ne­sium Bro­mide (liq­uid), Phos­phine (gas), Phos­pho­rous Oxy­chlo­ride (solid), Phos­pho­rus Pen­tox­ide (solid), Sodamide (solid), Sodium Metal (solid), Sul­fur Tri­ox­ide (liq­uid, solid), Sodium Hydrox­ide (liq­uid, solid),Sulfuric Acid (liq­uid), Tetrahy­dro­fu­ran (liq­uid), Thionyl Chlo­ride (liquid)

Sol­vents– highly toxic to mildly toxic

Ace­tone (liq­uid), Ace­toni­trile (liq­uid), Ani­line (liq­uid), Ben­zene (liq­uid), Ben­zyl Chlo­ride (liq­uid), Car­bon Tetra­chlo­ride (liquid),Chloroform (liq­uid), Cyclo­hexane (liq­uid), Diox­ane (liq­uid), Ethanol (liq­uid), Ethyl Acetate (liq­uid), Ethyl Ether (liq­uid), Freon 11 (tri-chloro– mono-fluoro-methane) (liq­uid), Hexane (liq­uid), Iso­propanol (liq­uid), methanol (liq­uid), meth­yl­ene chlo­ride (liq­uid), Petro­leum Ether (liq­uid), Pyri­dine (liq­uid), Toluene (liq­uid), O-Toluidine (liquid)

Metals-Salts

Mag­ne­sium Metal (solid), Red Phos­pho­rus (solid), Mer­curic Chlo­ride (solid), Lead Acetate (solid), Lithium Alu­minum Hydride (solid), Lithium Hydrox­ide (solid), Potas­sium Hydrox­ide (solid), Raney Nickel (solid), Sodium hydrox­ide (solid), Sodium Metal (solid in kerosene), Potas­sium Metal (solid in kerosene)

Other Haz-Mat Materials

Ammo­nia (anhy­drous), Alu­minum Chlo­ride (solid), Pal­la­dium (solid), Iodine (solid), Tho­rium Salts (solid), Fen­tanyl (solid), Hydro­gen (gas), Lyser­gic Acid Diethy­lamide (LSD) (Pow­der), MPTP (solid), MPPP (solid), Methyl fen­tanyl (solid), Pheny­lacetic Acid (solid),phenyl-2-propane (liq­uid), Piper­dine (liquid)

Enhanced by Zemanta

Nano-particulates and Modern Living

Large mouth bass Ralph B. Clark Regional Park ...

Image via Wikipedia

2004 brought dis­turb­ing infor­ma­tion to the fore­front of sun­screen tech­nolo­gies. In fact, many tech­nolo­gies rely upon nano-particles. Car­bon based nano-particles are toxic to “water

fleas” killing in tainted water, half the water flea pop­u­la­tion within two days. The large­mouth bass used in the test of nano par­ti­cles in the water were found to have severe brain dam­age lead­ing also to death. Man­u­fac­tured nano-particles are harm­ful to the envi­ron­ment and to health by load­ing into the organs of the bod­ies that they are exposed to.

Can Nano Par­ti­cles Cross the Blood Brain Barrier?

It is known that such nano-particles can cross the blood/brain bar­rier in humans, and it is eas­ily noted that met­als and re-actives attach to human tis­sues with ease. Whether car­bon, tita­nium, zinc, or other reac­tive, stud­ies sug­gest “severe” dam­age to brain tis­sue and liver tis­sues in the form of “lipid per­ox­i­da­tion.” Such instances have been linked, in humans, to ill­nesses such as Alzheimer’s dis­ease.

Where are Nano Par­ti­cles most often used?

Man­u­fac­tured nano-particles, many are mea­sur­ing a few bil­lionths of a meter, com­pose a sig­nif­i­cant mar­ket cre­at­ing Bil­lions in annual rev­enues. Such par­ti­cles are already used in com­mer­cial prod­ucts rang­ing from anti-aging creams, sun block lotions to car bod­ies and even ten­nis rac­quets. Nano par­ti­cles have unusual chem­i­cal prop­er­ties. They are con­sid­ered espe­cially promis­ing for appli­ca­tions in phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal drug deliv­ery, cos­met­ics as well as more eco­nom­i­cally advan­ta­geous appli­ca­tions such as fuel cells and solar cells.

Pub­lic Aware­ness and the Nano Par­ti­cle Dilemma

Many appli­ca­tions pro­posed for nano-particle met­als, car­bons or reac­tive com­pounds, are wide-ranging and many involve the release of such nano-particles in water or in soil. At this time, there is no inde­pen­dent body to assess the mod­i­fi­ca­tions or any reg­u­la­tions to pre­vent man­u­fac­tur­ers from using nano-particles that may do harm to the envi­ron­ment or human­ity itself. Before any reac­tive nano-particle is released into the envi­ron­ment there should be a coat­ing or other method to make sure it is safely bio­com­pat­i­ble. The sit­u­a­tion is made more com­pli­cated by the fact that most man­u­fac­tur­ers’ are unwill­ing to share their own safety stud­ies with the pub­lic or with com­peti­tors.

Final Notes

Many sun­screens, sun block­ers use nano-particle tita­nium, or zinc which to vary­ing degrees are bio-reactive. UV pro­tec­tion may include these in their prod­ucts.

Links:

www.eurekalert.org
www.etcgroup.org.

Mark T. Samp­son, “Type of buck­y­ball shown to cause brain dam­age in fish,” Eurekalert, March 28, 2004.

Justin Mullins, “Safety con­cerns over injectable quan­tum dots, New Sci­en­tist, Vol. 181, No. 2436 , 28
Feb­ru­ary 2004, p. 10.

Ben Wootliff, “”Bris­tish Sci­en­tist: Nanopar­ti­cles Might Move from Mom to Fetus,” Small Times, 14
Jan­u­ary 2004.  Avail­able on the Inter­net, www.smalltimes.com

Peter Hoet, Abder­rahim Nem­mar and Benoit Nemery, “Health Impact of Nano­ma­te­ri­als?” Nature
Biotech­nol­ogy, Vol. 22, no.1, Jan­u­ary 2004, p. 19.

Alex Kirby, “Tiny Par­ti­cles Threaten Brain,” BBC News Online, 8 Jan­u­ary, 2004. Avail­able on the
Inter­net, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3379759.stm

Jenny Hogan, “How safe is nan­otech?”  Spe­cial Report on Nano Pol­lu­tion, New Sci­en­tist, Vol. 177, No.
2388, 29 March 2003, p. 14.

http://www.nanowerk.com/spotlight/spotid=3096.php

Enhanced by Zemanta

Bottled Water Contamination and Conclusions

Images of bottled water

Image via Wikipedia

Bot­tled water comes with “Extra Fla­vor­ing”

For most peo­ple the taste of bot­tled water is a lux­ury. In homes where it is thought not fea­si­ble to place con­ven­tional water fil­ter sys­tem bot­tled water is the order of the day. In the pub­lic water sys­tem, con­sumers can receive test results every year, about water qual­ity issues. In the bot­tled water indus­try it is not required to dis­close the results of any con­t­a­m­i­nant test­ing that it con­ducts.

Bot­tle Water Runs Fowl of Purity Stan­dards

One Envi­ron­men­tal Work­ing Group (EWG) sur­vey of 228 bot­tled water brands revealed that less than half revealed their water’s source or treat­ment his­tory in their pro­mo­tional mate­ri­als.

The Envi­ron­men­tal Work­ing Group (EWG) in sam­ple test­ing found a wide array of chem­i­cal con­t­a­m­i­nants in every bot­tled water brand ana­lyzed, includ­ing some very toxic byprod­ucts of chlo­ri­na­tion. Their research found that bot­tled water can be dirt­ier than tap water and in some cases, con­tain bacteria.

Bot­tle Water, Should We Trust It?

The Envi­ron­men­tal Work­ing Group does not trust bot­tled water and is con­cerned that the indus­try as a whole does not pub­li­cize the results of their water qual­ity test­ing. The byprod­ucts of chlo­ri­na­tion are linked to blad­der can­cer. The sheer vol­ume of bot­tled water peo­ple con­sume cre­ates a wide host of more com­mon health issues from men­tal health to can­cer and auto immune dis­eases such as dia­betes.

Is Con­sumer Con­fi­dence Well Placed in Big Cor­po­rate Inter­ests?

Con­sumer con­fi­dence in the purity of bot­tled water is sim­ply not jus­ti­fied. The Envi­ron­men­tal Work­ing Group pur­chased and tested 10 pop­u­lar brands of bot­tled water, from gro­cery stores and other retail­ers in 9 states and the Dis­trict of Colum­bia. The results showed an aver­age of 8 con­t­a­m­i­nants and pol­lu­tants, with a total of 38 indi­vid­ual items found. One third of the con­t­a­m­i­nants was not reg­u­lated and exceeded safety health lim­its. Of the ten brands tested, four con­tained poten­tially harm­ful bac­te­ria.

Is Bot­tle Water Just Repack­aged Munic­i­pal Tap Water?

Bot­tled water showed no dif­fer­ence than repack­aged munic­i­pal tap water. In fact, it was more harm­ful in the fact that the chlo­rine dis­in­fec­tion byprod­ucts are more con­cen­trated in the plas­tic bot­tles. Some brands con­tained flu­o­ride with­out any label­ing stat­ing that fact. The decay rate and expo­sure rate to the plas­tic con­tainer and other process sys­tems leads to more com­pli­cate and “free rad­i­cal” mol­e­cules.

Bot­tled Water and the Chem­i­cal Soup, Is it as Healthy as Chicken Soup? No.

Bot­tled water has been shown by researcher to con­tain xeno-estrogens as a byprod­uct of the pro­cess­ing or pack­ag­ing. Harm­ful and highly bio reac­tive tri­halomethanes and bro­modichloromethanes were found in sam­ples of bot­tled water. These are respon­si­ble for repro­duc­tive dis­or­ders, can­cer and sev­eral auto-immune dis­eases.

Drugs and the Bot­tled Water Prod­uct, Wan­der­ing Through The Haze

The Envi­ron­men­tal Work­ing Group (EWG) found that most of the bot­tle water prod­ucts came from ordi­nary tap water sys­tems. These sys­tems have been found to have phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals that include anti-depressant med­ica­tions, antibi­otics, anti-consultants, mood sta­bi­liz­ers, sex hor­mones (birth con­trol), anti-seizure med­ica­tions, anti-inflammatory med­ica­tions, painkillers, and yes, even caf­feine. Some bot­tled waters con­tained lev­els of car­cino­gens that exceeded even the industry’s stan­dards.

Bot­tled Water and the Human Fac­tor, Is it a Risk?

Bot­tled water has been found to con­tain the byprod­ucts of chlorine-based dis­in­fec­tion, caf­feine, phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal drugs, fer­til­izer residue, plas­ti­ciz­ers, sol­vents, fuel pro­pel­lants, arsenic, other min­er­als and heavy met­als, and also radioac­tive iso­topes. This is water that is ingested by the pub­lic, from chil­dren to the elderly. There is not a sin­gle group that has been left immune to the expo­sure. When a dis­as­ter hap­pens, the first prod­ucts sent to the area are bot­tled water products.

Con­clu­sion: The impact of drink­ing bot­tled water is a long pro­gres­sive and accu­mu­la­tive prob­lem that results in increased med­ical costs and long term health care needs for an aging public.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Organo-Chlorines (Sucralose) and other Pesticides Associated with Obesity

Sucralose

Image via Wikipedia

There is a direct cor­re­la­tion to the amount of organo-chlorine blood plasma con­cen­tra­tion and weight con­trol. Organo-chlorines such as sucralose, inter­feres with the change the con­trol of ther­mo­ge­n­e­sis nec­es­sary for weight loss. Sucralose for exam­ple reduces the amount of good bac­te­ria in the intestines by 50 per­cent, and increases the pH level in the intestines.

“Free” Havoc and the Human Hor­mone

Organo chlo­rines are organic com­pounds that are linked with the reac­tive halide chlo­rines. This bond­ing makes unnat­ural com­pounds that eas­ily link up as “free Rad­i­cal agents” in the human body hor­mone imbal­ances, and organ mal­func­tions. The NIH’s Report on Car­cino­gens (11th ed) describes vinyl chlo­ride as a known cause of can­cer known to cause genetic damage.

Chlo­rine, the plas­tic con­nec­tion

Organo chlo­rines such as PVC is a plas­tic resin used in many con­sumer and indus­trial prod­ucts, includ­ing auto­mo­tive parts and acces­sories, fur­ni­ture, med­ical sup­plies, con­tain­ers, wrap­ping film, bat­tery cell sep­a­ra­tors, elec­tri­cal insu­la­tion, water dis­tri­b­u­tion sys­tems, floor­ing, win­dows, videodiscs, irri­ga­tion sys­tems, and credit cards.

Chlo­rine, the Pharma con­nec­tion

Some chem­i­cals and “Pharma” Drugs that are organo-chlorinated: aldrin, dield­rin, arochlor, chlor­dane, hep­tachlor, mirex hexa­chloroben­zene, oxy­chlor­dane, toxaphene, lin­dane, endo­sul­fan, methoxy­chlor, dico­fol, pen­tachlorophe­nol, PCB’s, PCA’s, dichlor, (2, 4, Dichloro-), and Phe­nols. They are found in pes­ti­cides, indus­trial sol­vents, and many of the PCBs are still found in our envi­ron­ment due to lack of over­sight into their indus­trial use.

As of 2004, there were at least 165 organo-chlorine based “Pharma Drugs” approved world­wide for use as phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal drugs. They include van­comycin, the anti­his­t­a­mine lorata­dine (Clar­itin), the anti­de­pres­sant ser­tra­line (Zoloft), the anti-epileptic lam­ot­rig­ine (Lam­ic­tal), and the inhala­tion anes­thetic isoflurane.

What goes in, must come out, what hap­pens there?

Decom­pos­ing chlo­rine com­pounds turn into “Tri­halomethanes”. These are the “digested” by-products of organo-chlorine prod­ucts such as the “antibac­te­r­ial” soap active ingre­di­ent “Tri­closan”. They also are formed as a by-product of chlo­rine when added to dis­in­fect drink­ing water. Such occur­ances hap­pen because Chlo­rine is a reac­tive halide and looks to find “chem­i­cal part­ners” that make it into more sta­ble com­pounds

Sec­ondary metabo­lites are cre­ated as a result of the “diges­tion” of a par­tic­u­lar chem­i­cal or its com­pound. Unsta­ble ele­ments desire to form com­fort­able states, in the soil or water env­i­ron that “chem­i­cal com­pan­ion­ship” is only avail­able to the oppor­tu­ni­ties found in that env­i­ron. Today we expe­ri­ence a wider vari­ety of chem­i­cal and nat­u­rally bio­log­i­cal com­pounds mix­ing and form­ing new part­ner­ships, which may be to the detri­ment of human­ity.

The most com­mon “preda­tors” of these chem­i­cals are fungi, and bac­te­ria. The life cycle of these “preda­tors” can and often do, attack other bio­log­i­cal immune sys­tems, such as aspergillums’ which mimic aller­gies and pneu­mo­nia symp­toms in humans and ani­mals. Fungi and bac­te­ria are sub­ject to “nat­ural selec­tion” and they can be encour­aged to “ben­e­fit” upon the wide spread use of chem­i­cals for their metabolism.

The use of organo chlo­rines with­out proper over­sight is cre­at­ing other more seri­ous prob­lems with “fun­gal, bac­te­r­ial” blooms that cre­ate “Franken” myco­toxic reac­tions. Organo-chlorines are included into the con­sumer mar­ket on a wide scale with­out the infor­ma­tion being put forth of the con­se­quences of their usage. Pes­ti­cides are not a nat­ural anti-bactericide, Tri­closan goes into the water waste sys­tem, decom­poses and cre­ates unnat­ural forms of bac­te­ria and fungi with the poten­tial to seri­ous harm to life on Earth.

Sec­ondary Metabo­lites include dioxin, The U.S. Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency (EPA) has found dioxin (a toxic byprod­uct of chlo­rine) to be 300,000 times more potent as a car­cino­gen than DDT. In this instance byprod­uct means sec­ondary metabo­lite or digested remains from either a bac­te­ria or fungi that has once more suc­cess­fully mutated. How many times must we get the “reac­tion” from one of these muta­tions, dump more antibi­otics at the “symp­toms” and hope for the “best”.

What Pes­ti­cide is Sucralose? Who really tested it, and for what???

Ani­mal Test­ing results for Sucralose.

Decreased red blood cells — sign of ane­mia — at lev­els above 1,500 mg/kg/day

Increased male infer­til­ity by inter­fer­ing with sperm pro­duc­tion and vital­ity, as well as brain lesions at higher doses

Enlarged and cal­ci­fied kid­neys (McNeil stated this is often seen with poorly absorbed sub­stances and was of no tox­i­co­log­i­cal sig­nif­i­cance. The FDA Final Rule agreed that these are find­ings that are com­mon in aged female rats and are not sig­nif­i­cant.)

Spon­ta­neous abor­tions in nearly half the rab­bit pop­u­la­tion given Sucralose, com­pared to zero aborted preg­nan­cies in the con­trol group

A 23 per­cent death rate in Lab rab­bits, com­pared to a 6 per­cent death rate in the con­trol group

Shrunken thy­mus glands (up to 40% shrinkage)

Enlarged liver and kid­neys
Atro­phy of lymph fol­li­cles in the spleen and thy­mus
Increased cecal weight (Rab­bit)
Reduced growth rate
Hyper­pla­sia of the pelvis
Exten­sion of the preg­nancy period
Aborted preg­nancy
Decreased fetal body weights and pla­cen­tal weights
Diar­rhea

Plasma sucralose has been reported to have a half-life of any­where from 2 to 5 hours in most stud­ies, although the half-life in rab­bits was found to be much longer at about 36 hours.

As of 2006, only six human tri­als have been pub­lished about Sucralose. Two of the six tri­als were com­pleted and pub­lished before the FDA approved the prod­uct for human con­sump­tion. In those two tri­als only 36 human sub­jects were tested with only 23 actu­ally receiv­ing any sucralose at all.

The test­ing lasted for four days, and only at the rela­tion­ship of sucralose and tooth decay. There were no absorp­tion tests con­ducted on women, chil­dren or the elderly. Only six men were eval­u­ated in a short trial. No tol­er­ances were ever set for sucralose.

What are the long term impli­ca­tions of soci­ety, when it breeds more “franken” organ­isms that will in time force the humans to become the “food”?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Water Fluoridation and Safety

The most com­mon source of Flu­o­ride prod­uct for water flu­o­ri­da­tion are sourced from China. Although the “prod­ucts” are cer­ti­fied there is no con­clu­sive pub­li­cally avail­able evi­dence for batch ver­i­fi­ca­tion of the purity of each bag of the prod­uct inbound to our water sys­tems. The flu­o­ri­da­tion chem­i­cals for drink­ing water in the US are not nec­es­sar­ily phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal grade. Abnor­mal unknown Fluoridation By State, wikipedia image insol­u­ble prod­ucts have been found within the flu­o­ri­da­tion tanks after the appli­ca­tion of Chi­nese Flu­o­ride prod­ucts are added.

Of any test shown the National San­i­ta­tion Foun­da­tion points to 90% of which are sodium flu­o­rosil­i­cate and flu­o­rosili­cic acid, both are as clas­si­fied haz­ardous wastes and are con­t­a­m­i­nated with var­i­ous impu­ri­ties. The National San­i­ta­tion Foun­da­tion sug­gests that the lev­els of arsenic in these chem­i­cals are rel­a­tively high (up to 1.6 ppb after dilu­tion into pub­lic water). Flu­o­ri­dated water increases the uptake of lead into children’s blood. Those “aber­rant prod­ucts” have no recur­ring and pub­li­cally avail­able tests show­ing what is in the prod­uct, nor has such infor­ma­tion been made available.

Flu­o­ride is the sim­plest ele­ment of Flu­o­rine. Flu­o­ride is nearly as reac­tive as hydro­gen. It can be used to cre­ate smooth lubri­cants and tough poly­mers such as Gore­tex or become a com­mon car­rier for phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal drugs such as Efavirenz, Pre­vacid, Suprane, Pax­i­pam, Glomerulin, Dihy­droflumet­hazide, Livostin, Lev­o­cabastin, Diflu­can, Flucy­tosin, Pro­lixin, Cyclo­cort, Diprosone, Advair, Diskus, Flonase, Lip­i­tor, Bay­col, Lescol, and Aprepi­tant .  

 

Flu­o­ride is not an essen­tial nutri­ent (NRC 1993 and IOM 1997) to the human body. No dis­ease has ever been linked to a flu­o­ride defi­ciency. Flu­o­ride is a reac­tive “free-radical” element.

 

Flu­o­ride is used in drugs for hyper­thy­roidism. It is linked to caus­ing hypothy­roidism (dan­ger­ously under­ac­tive thy­roid) in healthy peo­ple that con­sume flu­o­ride. Symp­toms of hypothy­roidism are depres­sion, fatigue, weight gain, mus­cle and joint pains, increased cho­les­terol lev­els, and heart dis­ease. Flu­o­ride has been shown to cause chro­mo­some dam­age and inter­fer­ence with the enzymes involved with DNA repair. Flu­o­ride dam­ages the men­tal IQ in those that drink flu­o­ri­dated liq­uids or prod­ucts the dam­age is quan­ti­fied by the amount exposed.

Flu­o­ride is toxic. It takes just 200 mg of the flu­o­ride ion is to kill a young child, and just 3–5 grams (e.g. a tea­spoon) to kill an adult. Flu­o­ride itself read­ily forms com­plexes with a large num­ber of metal ions; some of those met­als inter­act in the body (like cal­cium and mag­ne­sium) and met­als (like lead and alu­minum). Flu­o­ride has been linked to alu­minum deposits in the brain, pos­si­bly a key to Alzheimer’s dis­ease. Rats dosed pre­na­tally demon­strated hyper­ac­tive behav­ior. Flu­o­ri­da­tion is linked to bone cancers.

In the Asian sub­con­ti­nent, skele­tal flu­o­ro­sis is endemic. It is known to cause irritable-bowel symp­toms and joint pain. Early stages are not clin­i­cally obvi­ous, and may be mis­di­ag­nosed as (seroneg­a­tive) rheuma­toid arthri­tis or anky­los­ing spondyli­tis. Although lit­tle research has been done, there is pos­si­ble liver dam­age from flu­o­ride prod­uct inges­tion. Osteosar­coma directly linked to Flu­o­ride, accounts for about 3 per­cent of all child­hood can­cers. The five-year mor­tal­ity rate is around 50 per­cent, and nearly all sur­vivors have limbs ampu­tated, usu­ally legs

Based on the sci­en­tific lit­er­a­ture there is an increase of expo­sures to flu­o­ride. There is no real ben­e­fit to den­tal health from the inges­tion of flu­o­ride and the haz­ards to human health result­ing from such inges­tion. The haz­ards of ingest­ing flu­o­ride include acute tox­i­c­ity to peo­ple with impaired kid­ney func­tion, as well as chronic tox­i­c­ity and harm to DNA muta­tions, can­cer, repro­duc­tive effects, neu­ro­tox­i­c­ity, bone pathol­ogy and den­tal fluorosis.

Where does  flu­o­ride come from?

In the fer­til­izer indus­try, phos­phate rock is acidu­lated with sul­fu­ric acid, and the flu­o­ride con­tent of the rock evolves as volatile silico-fluorides. This was air pol­lu­tant within the smoke stack and its emis­sions. Today, flu­o­rine recov­ery is nec­es­sary because of strin­gent envi­ron­men­tal restric­tions. The response to the expense of clean­ing these harm­ful prod­ucts, the fer­til­izer indus­try and oth­ers deter­mined to con­vert them into harm­less by-products for dis­posal or, even more desir­ably, into mar­ketable prod­ucts, water addi­tives for the “pro­tec­tion of children’s teeth”.

City Worker shows NON-Water Sol­u­ble Sludge from Chi­nese “Flu­o­ride Product”

For every pound of com­mer­cial fer­til­izer, 5 pounds of con­t­a­m­i­nated phos­ph­o­gyp­sum slurry (cal­cium sul­fate) is cre­ated. Roughly, 32 mil­lion tons of new gyp­sum waste is cre­ated each year by the phos­phate indus­try, just in Cen­tral Florida alone. The aver­age “gyp­sum stack” takes up about 135 acres of sur­face area — equal to about 100 foot­ball fields — and can go as high as 200 feet.

Gyp­sum is such an inno­cent term.

How could Gyp­sum be harmful?

In real­ity, some gyp­sums are nat­u­rally occur­ring. The gyp­sum stacks pro­duced by the fer­til­izer indus­try are not “nat­ural”. The gyp­sum prod­uct is loaded with the pres­ence of ura­nium, and uranium’s var­i­ous decay prod­ucts (i.e.radium-226 which degrades into radon gas). Essen­tially, it is nat­ural and unavoid­able that phos­phate min­ing  results in radioac­tive mate­r­ial by prod­ucts. After the extrac­tion of sol­u­ble phos­phate, ura­nium, and its decay-products are con­cen­trated up to 60 times greater.

The world has become fer­til­izer depen­dent, but with care to the han­dling of the radioac­tive mate­ri­als found in these “gyp­sum stacks” there could be poten­tial mate­ri­als for safe low or pas­sive nuclear bat­tery appli­ca­tions for the pro­duc­tion of elec­tric­ity. Mod­ern sci­ence has a mag­ni­tude of solu­tions for turn­ing such “prob­lems” into new and safe energy inven­tions. The knowl­edge has long been tested and is ready to be put into place, if we can get the “inter­ests” out of the way of com­mon sense innovation.

Enhanced by Zemanta

AG and Consumer Venues">Dursban (Chlorpyrifos) Still Marketed and Used in AG and Consumer Venues

strawberry field

Image via Wikipedia

Chlor­pyri­fos is mar­keted under the brand names Bro­dan, Det­mol UA, Dowco 179, Durs­ban, Empire, Eradex, Lors­ban, Paqeant, Piri­dane, Scout, and Stipend. It was “pulled” from the con­sumer mar­ket in the USA for harm to humans in 2001. Inci­dence of lung can­cer was sta­tis­ti­cally sig­nif­i­cant to exposure.

Dow, the man­u­fac­turer of Chlor­pyri­fos (Durs­ban) has since been aggres­sively mar­ket­ing the prod­uct to other coun­tries such as India, and China. Durs­ban, Chlor­pyri­fos has been linked to periph­eral neu­ropa­thy, birth defects, ADHD (Autism), palsy, growth retar­da­tion, hypo­to­nia, and pro­found men­tal retar­da­tion. Chlor­pyri­fos (Durs­ban) quickly adheres to soil and plants, and enter s the ground­wa­ter shed sys­tem. It is an Organophosphate.

Grack­les, pigeons, mal­lard ducks and robins are the most affected by Chlor­pyri­fos. Duck expo­sure in run off waters, harms their birth rates and adversely affects the health of duck­lings. Robins are fre­quently found dead in areas where the pes­ti­cide has been spilled or “sprayed and drifted out of the desired spray zone”. Chlor­pyri­fos harms or kill bees, fish and earth­worms. It may be a con­trib­u­tor to “Colony Col­lapse Dis­or­der”.

Large-scale indus­trial farms still use the chem­i­cal for crops such as grapes, apples, cel­ery, blue­ber­ries and straw­ber­ries. In fact, roughly 2 mil­lion pounds of Chlor­pyri­fos are used under the Durs­ban name annu­ally. Over half of the prod­uct is used on three agri­cul­tural crops; corn 39%, tree nuts 15%, and soy­beans 9%.

Chlor­pyri­fos has been used for years as a foun­da­tion pest con­trol prod­uct. It is in cement foun­da­tions. Since cement is a mix­ture, Chlor­pyri­fos can migrate within the cement struc­ture itself. It is found in ant and roach baits that are child resistant.

A fur­ther amount of roughly 13 mil­lion pounds of Chlor­pyri­fos applied as an active ingre­di­ent within other prod­ucts is annu­ally pur­posed into struc­tural, agri­cul­tural and turf appli­ca­tions. This prod­uct leaches to var­i­ous degrees into ground­wa­ter, and other eco­log­i­cally sen­si­tive areas. The lat­est research points out that Chlor­pyri­fos dam­ages the human thy­roid pos­si­bly lead­ing to long term issues with thy­roid health. The Thy­roid is cru­cial to immune func­tion and hor­mone regulation.

The June 2010 edi­tion of the jour­nal “Pedi­atrics” dis­cusses that chil­dren that con­sume foods sprayed with Chlor­pyri­fos are at sig­nif­i­cantly higher risk for autism spec­trum ill­nesses. Even in these find­ings organophos­phates were found in children’s urine, chil­dren with some autism spec­trum ill­nesses have a lower abil­ity to remove such chem­i­cals from their systems.

Insects are able to develop resis­tance against Chlor­pyri­fos. Culex pip­i­ens L. (diptera: culi­ci­dae), west­ern flower thrip (Franklin­iella occi­den­talis), two-spotted spi­der mite (Tetrany­chus urticae), The Red Mite (Bed Bug’s that live in Poul­try houses), Ger­man Cock­roach (Orthoptera: Blat­tel­l­i­dae), house fly (Musca domes­tica L.), Red Flour Bee­tle (Tri­bolium cas­ta­neum), and the Lesser Grain Borer (Rhy­zop­ertha dominica (F.) all devel­oped resis­tance under lab­o­ra­tory test­ing to Chlor­pyri­fos. The Bed Bug has repeat­edly shown resis­tance in the field with a 70% sur­vival rate to expo­sure of 20% Dursban.

Can­cer Inci­dence Among Pes­ti­cide Appli­ca­tors Exposed to Chlorpyrifos

Chlor­pyri­fos Degra­da­tion in Con­crete Foun­da­tion Slabs

West­ern Flower Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thrip­i­dae) Resistance

Inher­i­tance of chlor­pyri­fos resis­tance in Culex pip­i­ens L. (diptera: culicidae)

Review of the Tox­i­col­ogy of Chlorpyrifos

Devel­op­men­tal Expo­sure to Chlorpyrifos

Chlor­pyri­fos is a neu­ro­toxin and sus­pected endocrine disruptor

Chlor­pyri­fos (Dursban)-associated birth defects

Chlor­pyri­fos — Iden­ti­fi­ca­tion, tox­i­c­ity, use, water pol­lu­tion poten­tial, eco­log­i­cal tox­i­c­ity and reg­u­la­tory information

Sus­cep­ti­bil­ity of the two-spotted mite to Chlorpyrifos

Chlor­pyri­fos Resis­tance in Ger­man Cock­roach (Orthoptera: Blattellidae)

Insect resis­tance to Organophos­pho­rus insecticides

Enhanced by Zemanta

Fipronil, (“Termidor”,”Frontline”) Creates Resistant Insects

Fipronil is a neu­ro­toxin, usu­ally in the form of a white pow­der. Fipronil is a com­mon ingre­di­ent for solu­tions man­ag­ing ants, bee­tles, cock­roaches, ter­mites and other infes­ta­tions. Fipronil is also used as the active ingre­di­ent in sev­eral flea con­trol prod­ucts for pets, as a field pest con­trol for corn, insect con­trol for golf courses and com­mer­cial turf. If Fipronil is intended to pro­vide greater safety than Chlor­pyri­fos, then expo­sure, per­sis­tence and phar­ma­co­ki­net­ics demand fur­ther examination.

As an agent, Fipronil sim­ply over whelms the GABA chan­nel found in both ver­te­brates (e.g., humans, fish, and wildlife) and inver­te­brates. Inver­te­brates are more sen­si­tive, but Fipronil is inher­ently a more potent dis­rup­tor of neu­ronal cell devel­op­ment than is Chlor­pyri­fos. That indi­cates that it may be some­thing that should not be used in the home set­ting, on ani­mals or within the range of children.

Fipronil is con­sid­ered sta­ble in the soil, but can leach into ground water and runoff to sur­face waters. The break down into sec­ondary metabo­lites varies from 90 days in a sta­ble field to shorter times in sun exposed areas. An ani­mal treated with a prod­uct con­tain­ing Fipronil, can have chem­i­cal residues on their skin for up to 56 days.

As the ani­mal has con­tact with peo­ple and its greater envi­ron­ment those residues per­sist and cre­ate adverse effects on those that come into con­tact with Fipronil. As it is a gen­eral pes­ti­cide, the active ingre­di­ent fipronil is toxic to birds, lizards, fish and many other ani­mals, even in minute con­cen­tra­tions with research show­ing clear adverse effects in repro­duc­tion and delayed development.

Fipronil is very toxic to bees and should not be applied to veg­e­ta­tion when bees are for­ag­ing,; it has been linked to colony col­lapse dis­or­der. Fipronil is highly toxic to upland game birds; in par­tic­u­lar there is at least one metabo­lite of Fipronil has a higher tox­i­c­ity to birds than the par­ent com­pound itself. Fipronil is very highly toxic for crus­taceans, insects and zooplankton.

In dogs, Fipronil can poten­tially cause skin prob­lems, repro­duc­tive and hor­mone issues. At low dosages, it has the poten­tial for caus­ing ner­vous sys­tem and thy­roid dam­age after long term expo­sure. The thy­roid is key to immune health and for a sta­ble men­tal tem­pera­ment. Some breeds may be more sus­cep­ti­ble to thy­roid dam­age lead­ing to sud­den vio­lent behav­iors: pos­si­bly the pit bull breeds. This needs more investigation.

In cats, Fipronil can rou­tinely causes chem­i­cal burns, hair loss, lethargy or exces­sive ner­vous sys­tem agi­ta­tion. On occa­sion cats expe­ri­ence tremors, impaired gait, and gas­troin­testi­nal upset, fol­lowed by exces­sive thirst, foam­ing at the mouth, with cough­ing and gag­ging. Though not as often, cats exposed to Fipronil have endured res­pi­ra­tory prob­lems, kid­ney enlarge­ment and fail­ure, thy­roid prob­lems, seizures and death.

Inde­pen­dent test­ing of Blat­tella ger­man­ica (L) Ger­man Cock­roaches, Pedicu­lus capi­tis Head  Lice,Cteno­cephalides felis Cat Flea, each were exposed over sev­eral gen­er­a­tions to Fipronil, Imidi­clo­prid, or Dield­rin, In all cases of expo­sure, genet­i­cally iso­lated resis­tance was deter­mined. The insects tested devel­oped resis­tance to degrees that would inter­fere poten­tially with the safe use of the products.

Insec­ti­cide Resistance-Associated Muta­tions in the Cat Flea

In Vivo Fipronil Sus­cep­ti­bil­ity in Strains of the Cat Flea

Sus­cep­ti­bil­ity of British head lice, Pedicu­lus capi­tis, to Imi­da­clo­prid and Fipronil

Cross-Resistance Between Dield­rin and Fipronil in Ger­man Cock­roach

Fipronil Behav­ior in Cot­ton and Trop­i­cal Soils

Is Fipronil safer than Chlor­pyri­fos? A Sci­en­tific Inves­ti­ga­tion

Fipronil, Pes­ti­cide Data­base Clas­si­fi­ca­tion, Tox­i­c­ity

Fipronil, Health Envi­ron­men­tal Impact for Tree Termites

Enhanced by Zemanta

Common Pathogens, Bacterial Infections

Biology of Bacteria

Bac­te­ria are micro­scopic, single-celled organ­isms. Sci­en­tists have iden­ti­fied them by their shape, makeup and growth habits. Bac­te­ria can be found col­o­niz­ing every sur­face of our envi­ron­ments, and some even live inside our diges­tive, res­pi­ra­tory, and gen­i­touri­nary tracts. Bac­te­ria can be either ben­e­fi­cial or harmful.

Types of Bac­te­ria

Round bac­te­ria are clas­si­fied as “cocci”, such as staphy­lo­cocci or strep­to­cocci. Rod shaped bac­te­ria are “cil­lus”, such as bacil­lus or E. coli. They are also clas­si­fied by the color pro­duced after a Gram stain is applied. Gram-positive bac­te­ria stain blue or vio­let, and gram-negative bac­te­ria stain pink or red.

Gram-positive cell walls typ­i­cally lack the outer mem­brane found in Gram-negative bac­te­ria. Most path­o­genic bac­te­ria in humans are Gram-positive organ­isms. Gram-positive bac­te­ria called Acti­nobac­te­ria dom­i­nate the micro­bial life in soil where they play a major role in the decay of dead organic matter.

Gram-negative bac­te­ria cell walls con­tain sub­stances which irri­tate the human body and trig­ger an imme­di­ate reac­tion in the immune sys­tem. If this toxic sub­stance enters the cir­cu­la­tory sys­tem, it causes the suf­ferer to develop a high tem­per­a­ture, high res­pi­ra­tion rate, and low blood pres­sure. This may lead to shock, which can be fatal.

His­tory of Antibiotics

In the mid 20th cen­tury antibi­otics became the panacea for all infec­tious ail­ments. Peo­ple began to take the influx of “new antibi­otic med­ica­tions” for granted, in many ways they still do. Over use of these med­ica­tions in all sorts of indus­tries for “value” usage has cre­ated resis­tant strains that cross over from use within the agri­cul­tural, human, vet­eri­nary, and plant biology’s.

Bac­te­ria are respon­si­ble for a wide range of ill­nesses, from gas­troin­testi­nal upset to skin dis­or­ders to life-threatening ill­nesses that require imme­di­ate atten­tion. The main­stay of bac­te­r­ial infec­tion treat­ment is antibi­otics. While antibi­otics work in the major­ity of cases, indis­crim­i­nate use of antibi­otics has resulted in the emer­gence of drug-resistant bacteria.

A healthy immune sys­tem and proper nutri­tion pre­vents bac­te­r­ial infec­tion or improves the immune response to infec­tion. An inflam­ma­tory immune response to bac­te­r­ial infec­tion results in fur­ther dam­age to the body. Com­mon bac­te­r­ial infec­tions include pneu­mo­nia, ear infec­tions, diar­rhea, uri­nary tract infec­tions, and skin disorders.

Bac­te­ria in the USA

In the United States, bac­te­r­ial infec­tions are a lead­ing cause of death in chil­dren and the elderly. Hos­pi­tal­ized patients and those with chronic dis­eases are at espe­cially high risk. In fact, the immune func­tion is impacted by fac­tors that include hor­monal sta­tus, age, and nutri­tional status.

Diet and mal­nu­tri­tion can cause a depressed immune sys­tem. Veg­etable oil is an FDA approved drug for thy­roid sup­pres­sion, harm­ing the immune sys­tem. Some peo­ple have a genetic pre­dis­po­si­tion to bac­te­r­ial infec­tion. Expo­sure to con­t­a­m­i­nated food (espe­cially eggs) or water, or con­tact with infected ani­mals or immune sup­press­ing chem­i­cals cre­ate an envi­ron­ment ready for bac­te­r­ial infec­tions. The elderly, infants, and peo­ple with impaired immune sys­tems are at greater risk for devel­op­ing severe diseases.

Recur­rent and more resis­tant forms of the same bac­te­ria are respon­si­ble for huge and repeated infec­tions. Roughly 95 per­cent of the cases of strep throat, mid­dle ear infec­tions, community-acquired lung infec­tions and pneu­mo­nia are from the same repeat­ing groups of bac­te­ria in the United States. Every time a dosage of antibi­otics is used another oppor­tu­nity occurs for these same groups of bac­te­ria to develop resistance.

This is why it is impor­tant to improve over­all immune health and use pre­ven­tion mea­sures that do not use pes­ti­cides such as tri­closan (antibac­te­r­ial soaps), chem­i­cal sprays with com­plex alco­hols or poten­tially immune sup­press­ing chem­i­cals. It is impor­tant to stay with the sim­ple items that bac­te­ria does not develop resis­tance to such as ordi­nary soaps with essen­tial oils that are nat­u­rally anti bac­te­r­ial such as, Laven­der, Basil, Cedar woods, Oregano and so many more.

Resis­tance is Natural

Antibiotic-resistant organ­isms directly impact increased hos­pi­tal­iza­tions, health costs, and higher mor­tal­ity rates. When an infec­tion is drug resis­tant, the high-dose and pro­longed antimi­cro­bial ther­apy results in the death of elim­i­nate help­ful bac­te­r­ial flora and pre­dis­pose peo­ple to fur­ther infec­tions. The adverse effect of antibi­otics include loss of essen­tial vit­a­mins and min­er­als, seizures, aller­gic shock, autoim­mune dis­ease, decreased platelets, kid­ney injury, poten­tial neg­a­tive drug to drug inter­ac­tion, and death.

The goal of these “drugs” is to kill invad­ing bac­te­ria with­out harm­ing the host. Their effec­tive­ness depends on the mode of action, drug dis­tri­b­u­tion, site of infec­tion, immune sta­tus of the host, and resis­tance fac­tors within the bac­te­ria. The real­ity is to make this method of Heal­ing as obso­lete as pos­si­ble in com­mon prac­tice because it leads to fur­ther infec­tions and disease.

Infor­ma­tional support

Nutri­tional Sup­port for the Immune System

Agri­cul­tural use of Antibiotics

Antibi­otic Resis­tance Trends

Antibi­otic Resis­tance and Pub­lic Health

Global Antibi­otic Resis­tance Den­tal Impact

Com­mu­nity Fac­tors for Antibi­otic Resistance

Brain Cancers and Tumor Linked to Pesticide Exposure

Since the first appli­ca­tions of pes­ti­cides start­ing in the early 20th cen­tury Brain can­cers and tumors have increased. In 2010, sci­en­tists have pre­dicted 100,000 vic­tims of some type of either brain Can­cer, or Tumor whether as a pri­mary dis­ease of as part of other seri­ous com­pli­ca­tions. Allo­pathic med­i­cine has rather poor sur­vival rates for patients with astro­cy­tomas or glioblas­tomas is about 50% at 1 year, 25% at 2 years, and 10 to 15% at 5 years” using con­ven­tional therapies.

There are two lines of approach in Med­i­cine; one is called Natur­o­pathic and the other Allo­pathic.

Natur­o­pathic is the least inva­sive with con­sid­er­a­tion that side effects or the out­come of a treat­ment may be worse than the orig­i­nal dis­ease. Allo­pathic, focuses on the imme­di­ate symp­toms, the phys­i­cal cir­cum­stance and treats those symp­toms with­out regard to the qual­ity of life or health of the individual.

Exam­ples of the dif­fer­ences between Allo­pathic Approach and Natur­o­pathic Approach

Knee or Hip replace­ments– An allo­pathic doc­tor finds a patient with no bone car­ti­lage or a dis­abled joint, and then rec­om­mends a joint replace­ment where the joint is cut out and a man­u­fac­tured joint is placed into the bone and bolted in, like a bio­log­i­cal mechanic. After a few years the bone may weaken and replace­ment will be impos­si­ble leav­ing the patient dis­abled and in pain.

A Natur­o­pathic approach is to advise the patient with no bone car­ti­lage or a dis­abled joint, about meth­ods for re-growing the car­ti­lage, or feed­ing the joint and phys­i­cal ther­a­pies that help with this. A reg­i­men of sup­ple­ments, exer­cise and ther­apy assists the bone to grow. The patient does not need a surgery, or inva­sive ther­a­pies. Pain may be a part of the over­all heal­ing process, but herbal ther­a­pies help con­trol it and a per­ma­nent dietary, life style change pre­vents the dam­age from get­ting worse or reoccurring.

There are no tests to pre­dict risk of brain can­cer. The best oppor­tu­nity to pre­vent recur­rence, or at least slow­ing down the dis­ease is to use dietary defen­sive mea­sures. Sci­en­tists have con­cluded that some fac­tors are linked to brain can­cers and tumors. Indi­vid­u­als exposed to above aver­age amounts of pes­ti­cides, beauty prod­ucts, hair dyes and such, or use a lot of glue prod­ucts are at increased risk.

Vit­a­min D defi­ciency that occurred before birth may have set the stage for brain tumor for­ma­tion later in life. Vit­a­min D remains impor­tant after birth, as it acti­vates chem­i­cal path­ways, vital for brain health. Surgery sur­vival rates par­tic­u­larly for Brain, Colon and Lung can­cers are low­est dur­ing the late win­ter; par­tic­u­larly from Feb­ru­ary to March have lower Vit­a­min D lev­els. This has been sup­ported with stud­ies that show that the fur­ther away from the equa­tor the higher the risk for Brain Can­cer, cor­re­lat­ing directly to Vit­a­min D lev­els in the Bloodstream.

LEF.org researches the alter­na­tives to allo­pathic med­i­cine with com­pe­tent med­ical physi­cians and researchers. They are ded­i­cated to the healthy exten­sion of the qual­ity of life.

Vit­a­min D3
Mela­tonin
Sele­nium
Vit­a­min E
Berber­ine (Golden Seal)
Boswellia
Cur­cumin (Turmeric)
Quercetin
Green Tea extract
Trans-Resveratrol
Sul­foraphane

Apartment Owners Face Bedbugs and Win

After Years of Hav­ing to fight a los­ing bat­tle one land lord won.
He reported that he had bed bugs so bad that they lined the wall bor­der paper along the ceil­ing, and the bed bugs only turned their bel­lies upward to enjoy his lat­est onslaught of Pest con­trol prod­ucts.
I explained that from my expe­ri­ence with Nat­ural Pest con­trol meth­ods, there is not need to remove items and fur­ther con­t­a­m­i­nate the world with bed bug eggs.
He did not believe me, I sim­ply said, start at an point where you could run the bed bugs into a “pheromone cor­ral” then go in for the kill and smother the lot.
Few peo­ple under­stand that bed bugs can run as fast as roaches and are adept at maneu­ver­ing through elec­tri­cal, insu­la­tion, and into the crawl ways. In fact usu­ally it is too late when obser­va­tion of a bed bug is appar­ent.. by then there is usu­ally mil­lions hid­ing in the walls.
Bed bugs have a unique moldy sweet odor, so when the “odor” is around take no chances.. LEAVE or use this method for con­trol­ling and killing Bed bugs.. noth­ing on the mar­ket is safer nor as effec­tive. This prod­uct has no Xeno-estrogens that bed bugs iden­tify with pest con­trol.. they know how to avoid the xeno-extrogens..but your fam­ily can­not and can suf­fer long term effects from sex­ual ori­en­ta­tion, to rages, uneasi­ness and emo­tional turmoil.

The man I describe in this arti­cle killed four floors of bed bugs, in a sin­gle day with half the time an ordi­nary pest con­trol agent could do it .. He only had to spray once and did not have to move his ten­ants out of the build­ing.. Safe Food safe nat­ural and Organic, this is a pheromonal night­mare for bed bugs but in turn it is pleas­ant for peo­ple, cats and dogs.
Not rec­om­mended for birds, rodents or rab­bits.
Bed bugs are regard­less of the estab­lish­ment, a vec­tor wait­ing to hap­pen. It has been proven that most of the resis­tant bed bugs are from the Poul­try indus­try car­ried along work­ers home­ward and into the gen­eral pop­u­la­tion. Bed Bugs cre­ate pain, and poten­tially open wounds to MSRA.
Please con­sider a prod­uct that works fast, cor­rectly and com­pletely.
Bed Bug Control

Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.